TLDR:
Open source software (OSS) can be secure because many people can read and fix the
code, not just hackers. That helps find bugs faster but it only works if
people are actually watching and maintaining the project.
{tocify} $title={Table of Contents}
Why open source can still be secure even if hackers see the code
It sounds risky when anyone can read the code. But security should not rely on secrecy. If the design is public then experts and users can check it and report problems. A system that is truly secure should still be safe even if attackers know how it works.
Mental picture: Think of a safe with blueprints. Handing out the blueprints does not let someone open the safe without the key. Other people who see the blueprints can point out a weak hinge so you fix it before someone tries to break in.
How more people checking the code helps find problems faster
When lots of people can read the code, mistakes are more likely to be found. Popular projects usually have many developers and security researchers looking at changes. That means bugs often get noticed and patched sooner than in secret code.
Real examples where open code helped catch problems
- Heartbleed — a serious bug in OpenSSL that was found and fixed because people could inspect the code.
- XZ backdoor — someone tried to sneak harmful code into an open project and users caught odd behaviour which led to discovery.
Why open source still has risks if no one reviews the code
The public code only helps if people actually look at it. Many projects are small and run by one or two people. If no one else reviews changes then bugs can hide for a long time.
Other risks include fake contributors who slowly add bad code and software that depends on many other libraries. A flaw in one small library can spread to lots of projects that use it.
How open source security compares to closed source software
Closed source means only the company has the code. That can slow down attackers who want to study it, but it also means only the company can fix issues. Open source lets anyone report and fix bugs. That usually leads to faster patches, but only if people act on reports.
Why people still choose closed-source software
Companies often pick closed-source tools because they want vendor support, guaranteed service, or features that are not in open source yet. Sometimes closed-source fits their systems better. That does not mean closed-source is safer by default.
You already use open source a lot
Many familiar apps and systems are open source or use open source parts. If you use Firefox, VLC, Android phones, or websites running on Linux or PostgreSQL, you are already using open source code every day.
How to tell if an OSS project is safe to use
Not all projects are equal. Look for signs that the project is alive and cared for:
- It gets regular updates and releases
- People report bugs and those bugs get fixed
- There is an active community or issue tracker
- The code is hosted on a public repo like GitHub and shows recent activity
If a project has not been updated in years or no one seems to be watching it, it might be risky to use.
How maintainers review and approve code changes
Open source projects usually have trusted maintainers who review contributions before accepting them. That review step helps stop malicious changes. But maintainers must be careful and limit who can merge code because social engineering or weak processes can let bad code slip in.
Quick summary
- Open source helps find bugs faster because more people can inspect the code.
- Transparency is useful but not enough on its own. Active maintenance matters more.
- Watch for tiny projects or abandoned libraries, they can be weak links.
- Closed source can hide bugs for longer, but it can also be well maintained.
- Pick projects with clear governance, regular updates, and an active community.
Final thought: open code gives more chances to find and fix issues, but it still needs people to show up and do the work. If they do, open source tends to be safer. If they do not, it may not be.
Read also: